A few more things about the fanfic kerfuffle

[owlmoose]

It appears that Gabaldon has, after posting a fauxpology (the classic "I'm sorry if anyone's feelings were hurt" response), deleted all her posts on the subject. Couldn't stand the heat? Some attempt to save face? Since the posts are gone, and she hasn't replaced them with a statement on their removal, we'll probably never know why. But I hope she knows that, on the Internet, wank is forever.

I also wanted to share two follow up notes to the GRRM posts. First, check out this totally fascinating post from nihilistic_kid which basically demolishes GRRM's claim that H.P. Lovecraft died in poverty because he allowed unlicensed derivative fanworks of his books. I really recommend this post, not only for the information about Lovecraft, but especially for links and discussion in the comments that cast the infamous Marion Zimmer Bradley fanfic case in a somewhat different light.

The other is from GRRM himself. He's posted on this issue twice more since his original comment on the situation. The first was a standard attempt to simultaneously entrench and backpedal (he did acknowledge the copyright misconpetion, sorta), but the other is actually fairly thoughtful and interesting, and it's worth reading, if you can get past his annoying habit of referring to fan writers as "fan fictioneers". It's an emotional look at what his characters mean to him, and why reaction to fanworks can be just as much about love for the original creators as for the fan writers. Fan writers create out of love for the characters and the world; original creators feel protective of their creations for the same reason. While I still take issue with some of the particulars of his argument, I find it a lot more sympathetic than the usual "copyright/stealing/talentless hacks/write your own stuff/ZOMGporn!" tactics that pro authors often use against fic. Good debate in the comments, too. For starters, I recommend this comment, a semi-rebuttal from dagas_isa taking issue with the implication that pro authors who allow and/or encourage fic love their characters less than GRRM. And I agree: not more or less, although possibly different.

Comments

[wounded-melody.livejournal.com]

BAAAHLETION! Well, she is still reachable on the Compuserve board. And she is mentioned on Encyclopedia Dramatica.

[regann]

I think it's telling that fanfiction sees the most pushback from novelists, as opposed to, say, TV creators/writers, comic authors, etc. I'm assuming it's something to do with a) TV/movies/comics/games are more collaborative by their nature and b) since the medium is the same (text), it is harder to negotiate the difference for the pro-writers.

(And personally, I think some writers are insecure and have a fear of someone 'doing it better' that in part feeds their antipathy of fanfic.)

[ovo-lexa.livejournal.com]

I'm no fan of Derleth's work, but even I can admit that it's his fanficery and devotion that saved Lovecraft's work from almost certain oblivion. o_o

also, Lovecraft died from cancer, not copyright, wth?

/never heard this argument before.

[iamleaper]

KJ, thank you so much for your continued updates on this debate(/shitstorm) and your thoughtful commentary. I admit that I have missed most of what happened, but thanks to your posts, I can go back and have a look.

The mindset of some people astonishes me.

[dagas-isa.livejournal.com]

The more I think about it, the parenting metaphor he used is completely apt once I get past the surface implication that "our characters are our children" and look at say the difference between stricter and more lenient parents (as well as the level of parental control that's going to be exercised once the kids 'leave the nest' as it is).

Obviously fanfiction is not going to be anything the GRRM is ever going to want for his character, but I doubt J.K. Rowling loves her characters any less for allowing her fans to write fic about them.