owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2005-09-06 11:49 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
  • Current Mood: stunned
Entry tags:

unexpected

Okay, I know I am way over my posting quota for today, but I couldn't let this one get by.

Remember how I said the other day that the CA Assembly was highly unlikely to pass the same-sex marriage bill that got through the state Senate?

I was wrong.
Threaded | Flat

[identity profile] yuna-flowering.livejournal.com 2005-09-07 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
That's great news! :) If Arnie vetoes it, he's going to get one heck of a backlash (same as if he signs it, but it's easier to be hated for doing the right thing).

J

[identity profile] kunstarniki.livejournal.com 2005-09-07 11:35 am (UTC)(link)
*enthusiastic, prolonged applause* You must be so proud of your state. G-d! what we couldn't give for a legislature like that! Let's hear it for California and Massachusetts! The decent people may someday rise again. This was a very sensibly written act. And damn the Gropinator if he vetoes it. What's he afraid of? That all the bosomy women will be snapped up by other bosomy women?

[identity profile] luvmoose.livejournal.com 2005-09-07 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)
From the article: "Schwarzenegger's office has repeated that he believes the issue should be decided either by a vote of the people or a court decision."

Unless, of course, there are activist judges. In which case, the new Supremes will just beat them down.
Threaded | Flat