KJ (on LJ) ([identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] owlmoose 2007-11-06 01:43 am (UTC)

The whole "sports fandom > media fandom" thing baffles me, too. My love of the San Francisco Giants is rational and socially acceptable, but my love of a video game series is not? Where's the logic in that? If anything, team loyalty is even *less* rational, since it's almost always based on where you happen to live.

I do think that movies, TV, books, etc. can make you think, but it depends on the particular movie/show/book much more than it does for games. Very rarely is it the case that you can figure out the rules of a game and then go on autopilot. If a game doesn't present continually varied and increasingly difficult challenges, then it's a *bad game*. I don't know why games are painted as passive; I think anyone who tries to say that has probably never played out.

Basically, though: Word.

Thanks! :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org