owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2006-12-14 03:45 pm
Entry tags:

Gaming article

Are Video Games Evil?

Nice overview of this issue from The Wilson Quarterly. Thoughtful and well-argued; comes down pretty firmly on the pro-gaming side. There's a lot here but this tidbit particularly jumped out:

In The Ultimate History of Video Games (2001), game journalist Steven Kent cites pinball as a mechanical ancestor of today’s digital games. Pinball created a panic in some quarters—no pun intended—as a new and dangerous influence on society. Foreshadowing the antics of today’s antigaming politicians was New York mayor Fiorello La Guardia, who smashed pinball machines with a sledgehammer and banned them from his city in the 1930s, a prohibition that was not lifted until the 1970s. (To be fair to La Guardia, governments have long perceived societal threats from new games. In the 1400s Scotland banned golf, now its proud national pastime, because too many young men were neglecting archery to practice their swings.)

[identity profile] delladella.livejournal.com 2006-12-15 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Makes me wonder if you’ve heard of this new kill-the-heathens videogame based on the Left Behind series of books. If you want to check out some truly awesome hypocrisy in action, here’s a start (http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/12/6/4137/52113/religious_war/Focus_On_The_Family_Endorses_Satanic_Role_Playing_Religious_Warfare_Video_Game_As_Kid_Safe).

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2006-12-15 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I have heard of this. Some of the students were talking about it the other day, and the bit they focused on was that you could play either "good" or "evil". They came to the conclusion that everyone would play evil, because what's the fun in being good?

I hadn't realized it was created by the Left Behind folks, though. They scare me. A lot.

[identity profile] delladella.livejournal.com 2006-12-16 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
Thing is, if you play on the Antichrist’s side, you can’t win. Or at least so I hear.

Yeah. Looks to me like an extremely cynical attempt to do some outreach. But this is the group who rails on violence in videogames—just that, in this one, it’s all fine. Religious violence ftw and all, I guess.

[identity profile] oswulf.livejournal.com 2006-12-15 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect that there's a tendency from all corners to oversimplify this. For that matter, there's probably a human tendency to oversimplify most things.

Have violent video games in some cases reinforced violent tendencies and caused real-world violence? I expect they probably have.

Have violent video games provided an outlet for people to work off their frustrations and thereby avoided real-world violence that otherwise would have occured? I expect they probably have.

Have some video games by their very nature gotten kids reading that otherwise would have been reluctant? My wife will attest to that.

Okay, I'd go on but that's all the time I have at the moment.

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2006-12-15 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
For that matter, there's probably a human tendency to oversimplify most things.

I agree with this, definitely.

Have you read Everything Bad Is Good For You by Steven Johnson? It's referenced in the article. He takes the premise that video games, television, and movies are maturing as artistic forms, getting more complex, and end up actually being good for our brains rather than rotting them. There is (surprise!) some over-simplication, but overall I think it holds up, and I recommend it.

[identity profile] oswulf.livejournal.com 2006-12-22 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think I have. I did enjoy reading _Freakanomics_ about a month back.