owlmoose: (narnia - peter sword)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2013-01-18 04:23 pm
Entry tags:

Thoughts on Hobbitses

My building was doing testing on its fire alarms this afternoon, so I decided that made a good excuse to get out of the house and go see The Hobbit. I enjoyed the Lord of the Rings trilogy quite a bit, so I expected to like this one, too, and was not disappointed. I’m looking forward to the next installment, although I have a hard time seeing how Peter Jackson gets two more three-hour movies out of the remaining material, appendices or no appendices. The end of this film, with Bilbo making his very premature statement followed by the awakening of Smaug, just felt so much like a halfway point. I do appreciate all the bits and pieces of background that foreshadow Sauron’s rise to power, which, if I recall, wasn’t even hinted at in The Hobbit. It gives the story more weight, and connects it better to the first trilogy, but I think it could have been accomplished in two movies, and I can’t imagine what we get out of a third. But I guess we’ll see.

Seeing movies in 3D always reminds me of why I don’t usually watch movies in 3D.All the swooping and spiraling detracts from the experience, and busy action scenes are a lot harder to me to follow (I had the same problem with Avatar). There were a few places I found it effective, but for the most part I’d just as soon have watched the 2D version.

Martin Freeman was born to play Bilbo Baggins. Also, I now have a better understanding of Richard Armitage fandom, and may well be joining your ranks. I still prefer him without the beard and the bushy hair, though. ;) Balin is a great character, too. The rest of the dwarves kind of run together, except for the one in the swoopy hat who was kind to Bilbo when he tried to leave, and the cute scruffy archer one (Tumblr informs me that this was Kili). But given how many there are, and how they are mostly not separately developed, I think I can be forgiven. ;)

I think most of the criticisms I’ve seen of the movie are fair — character development sacrificed for action, too long (as mentioned above), a lack of diversity (a problem, to be fair, that’s inherent in the source, and at least Jackson made baby steps toward fixing it by bringing in a couple of female characters). I could also have done with fewer fat jokes. But most of these things didn’t bother me while I was actually watching it, just on reflection.

I'm glad we only have to wait a year for the next one. This thing Peter Jackson does, filming his movie series all at once to minimize waits and actor drift, is a good practice and more filmmakers should do it.
fox_bard: (October Woods)

[personal profile] fox_bard 2013-01-20 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
The Necromancer storyline was hinted at in The Hobbit, but (as I dimly recall) only when Bilbo is passing through Rivendell on his way back to the Shire. Elrond and Gandalf have a conversation about it that Bilbo only half understands while napping at the table.

I think my biggest complaint is the lack of Fifteen Birds in Five Fir Trees. And the lack of lyrics for Over the Misty Mountains Cold. I would have preferred the past of Thorin and Co. placed in context with their visit and not tacked onto the very beginning - but that's me. I also don't understand why the closing credits version of Misty Mountains was all newly made-up lyrics, which I found rather disappointing.

However, I really liked the additions showing the Necromancer plot and Radagast, and I liked the way they developed Bilbo's character.

As for three movies - if they drag out the misery that was Mirkwood and embellish on Gandalf fighting the Necromancer, it can work. I personally hope they do a more epic battle than the Rankin & Bass cartoon's flea circus approach to the Battle of the Five Armies. At least the third movie will have that. ^__^