owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2005-11-02 07:47 pm
Entry tags:

lucifer breaks out the ice skates

I actually found myself agreeing with an article in The National Review.

Don't panic, it's not about politics. I haven't completely lost my mind. No, it's about literature, specifically the reordering of C.S. Lewis's Narnia series to be read chronologically rather than in the order the books were published, making The Magician's Nephew the first book in the series rather than The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. The writer of the article lays out reasons both literary and practical for reading the books in the original sequence -- LWW is written to introduce readers to the Narnia universe and its concepts in a way that TMN is not -- and I think he is absolutely right on every count. I've always felt the renumbering is a travesty, and now I have the words to explain why.

An interesting piece, worth reading I think if you have any interest in Narnia. Assuming you can force yourself to skim past the weird attempts to praise Jeb Bush. *shudder* At least that part is over with quickly.

[identity profile] yuna-flowering.livejournal.com 2005-11-03 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
Lol. I love the Narnia series- we read them in 4th grade and I made my mom get them for me. My favorite would have to be LW&W, followed by the Silver Chair.

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2005-11-03 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
So now I'm curious. What order did you read them in? The order of publication or this new order?

we read them in 4th grade
That's probably about how old I was when I read them for the first time, too. I also own a set and reread them every couple of years. They are among my favorite books.

[identity profile] yuna-flowering.livejournal.com 2005-11-03 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
The order they were published- I read LW&W first. But strangely, my copy of it is officially #2, on the dust jacket and all that.