owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2006-08-01 11:39 am
Entry tags:

New Yorker article on Wikipedia

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060731fa_fact

Long but interesting. Key quotes:

The president of Encyclopedia Britannica on Wikipedia: "Wikipedia is to Britannica as ‘American Idol’ is to the Juilliard School."

The founder of Wikipedia on Britannica: "Wikipedia is to Britannica as rock and roll is to easy listening. It may not be as smooth, but it scares the parents and is a lot smarter in the end."

[identity profile] giandujabird.livejournal.com 2006-08-01 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Hunh. Wasn't there an article which mentioned something about WP and EB having similar levels of errors? (Perhaps you had mentioned it in an eariler blog post, but LJ doesn't lend itself to useful searching.)

ah yes, the Nature article

[identity profile] giandujabird.livejournal.com 2006-08-01 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
From Nature, Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html)

And a couple more on the topic:
http://www.infotoday.com/Searcher/mar06/berinstein.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2006-08-01 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I have seen the Nature article but I don't remember whether I linked to it. There was an amusing and interesting defense on the Britannica site at one point; I'll have to see if I can dig it up.

[identity profile] cosmorific.livejournal.com 2006-08-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)