owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2007-10-19 01:43 pm

A few book and research related links

I caught up on some of my library blogs yesterday, and I found a few tidbits:

-- Judging books by their covers and why boys don't read. Should publishers avoid book covers that are too "girlie" to encourage boys to pick them up? A sound idea, or more pandering to stereotypes? I really can't decide.

-- Growth vs. quality on Wikipedia. The debate between Inclusionists (we have the space, so why not have articles on everything?) and Deletionists (too much trivia is bad for our reputation) as demonstrated by a deletion war over a possibly trivial entry by founder Jimmy Wales. The article led me to Wikirage, a listing of the Wikipedia articles that are currently receiving the most edits. Edit-war watch?

-- While we're on the subject. Since we're in presentation season at work, the subject of Wikipedia keeps coming up when we talk to students about doing research. J has taken to making live edits during class presentations, which has been really effective. The one time I saw her doing it, one student sat up in amazement. "I didn't know you could do that!!" I love getting to see mental gears turn like that. Of course, the edit only lasted about 20 minutes, but it was a pretty blatant one. I wonder how something more subtle would do.

-- "Theives try do-it-yourself censorship": an article on the phenomenon of checking out a book from the library, then refusing to return it because you think it shouldn't be available there. This strikes me as much worse than making a protest to the school board/library director/whoever. I can not like it when a community decides to ban a book, but at least there was a process and opinions get heard. This is the very worst sort of enforcing your beliefs on others. Another article on a similar case.

-- One of the funniest things I've read in awhile. A grad student's adventures as a library tech. Link via [livejournal.com profile] plantgirl.

[identity profile] plantgirl.livejournal.com 2007-10-21 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
*I* object to pink/girlish covers. It affects the likelihood I'll pick up a book to see what it's about, and if I do read one, I'm more likely to avoid reading it in public, because I'm embarrassed to be seen with it.

So I object to publishers assuming pink sells more books, and I object to their stereotypes for what women will buy. Obviously the money is supporting their argument...

Then again, how often do publishers release a book with two covers and track the difference in sales, and whether or not those sales were to men or to women? Do you happen to know?

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2007-10-21 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know, but it would definitely make an interesting experiment. Different but related, I know that in the UK, the Harry Potter books are sold in adult/children's editions, where the only difference is the cover. It'd also be interesting to know if they track those sales, and if so what the differences are.