owlmoose: (Default)
KJ ([personal profile] owlmoose) wrote2005-10-22 01:36 pm
Entry tags:

writing test

Found via [livejournal.com profile] kunstarniki. It's a tool that analyses your writing and attempts to determine whether the author is male or female. Link here.

For the first one, I put in most of a fiction tidbit that I wrote recently (not part of AGL, maybe a piece of a new story).

Words: 1024

Female Score: 1677
Male Score: 1139

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!


For the second, I pulled in about half of the lastest AGL chapter.

Words: 1645

Female Score: 1962
Male Score: 1773

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!


But the scores are a lot closer than the first time. The first passage is a love scene, the second is setting up a battle . Random chance? Or not?

Finally, I tested it on a fairly long LJ entry.

Words: 728

Female Score: 1266
Male Score: 1540

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: male!


Interesting. I would think that personal writing would be more likely to come out correct, not less.

The author of the site claims that the algorithm should have an 80% hit rate, but the results on the site are lot farther off, not quite 60%. Hm.

[identity profile] angeltaisha.livejournal.com 2005-10-22 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
That was a fun meme. I came up male on one of my one shots, and female on a one shot and chapter of my latest fic. Why was it that I was hoping to be male? Somethings not right with that, LOL!

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2005-10-22 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I was sort of hoping to come out male, as well, especially since the second fiction passage is first person and written from a man's point of view! :)

I think it's because we have these associations with "feminine" as being "weak". Which is stupid, but so culturally ingrained.

[identity profile] angeltaisha.livejournal.com 2005-10-22 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's because we have these associations with "feminine" as being "weak". Which is stupid, but so culturally ingrained.


Yeah, unfortunately that's what I initially thought.

I

[identity profile] kunstarniki.livejournal.com 2005-10-22 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Since the analysis is based upon certain arbitrarily choses 'theme' words, I interpreted the results not so much as judging my physical gender - which genitalia I possess - as how my mind functions. Most tests of this nature do score me as male. I have always assumed that was because I do not react to the usual 'female' triggers like babies, fashion, squeeing etc. If you look at the theme words, you will note that most of the 'me' type words are seen as feminine. However, it was fun, wasn't it? ;)

Re: I

[identity profile] owlmoose.livejournal.com 2005-10-22 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you read the NY Times article that the creator of the test links to? You're right -- the algorithm calls out personal pronouns as "feminine" while prepositions and quanifiers are "masculine".

I do tend to come out feminine on "what gender is your brain" type tests, but just barely.

Definitely an interesting exercise. Thanks for finding it!

[identity profile] elysdir.livejournal.com 2005-11-04 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
For some further thoughts, see my entry about this (http://www.kith.org/journals/jed/2003/08/20/1389.html), and various people's comments on same.