![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
writing test
Found via ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
kunstarniki. It's a tool that analyses your writing and attempts to determine whether the author is male or female. Link here.
For the first one, I put in most of a fiction tidbit that I wrote recently (not part of AGL, maybe a piece of a new story).
Words: 1024
Female Score: 1677
Male Score: 1139
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!
For the second, I pulled in about half of the lastest AGL chapter.
Words: 1645
Female Score: 1962
Male Score: 1773
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!
But the scores are a lot closer than the first time. The first passage is a love scene, the second is setting up a battle . Random chance? Or not?
Finally, I tested it on a fairly long LJ entry.
Words: 728
Female Score: 1266
Male Score: 1540
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: male!
Interesting. I would think that personal writing would be more likely to come out correct, not less.
The author of the site claims that the algorithm should have an 80% hit rate, but the results on the site are lot farther off, not quite 60%. Hm.
kunstarniki. It's a tool that analyses your writing and attempts to determine whether the author is male or female. Link here.For the first one, I put in most of a fiction tidbit that I wrote recently (not part of AGL, maybe a piece of a new story).
Female Score: 1677
Male Score: 1139
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!
For the second, I pulled in about half of the lastest AGL chapter.
Female Score: 1962
Male Score: 1773
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!
But the scores are a lot closer than the first time. The first passage is a love scene, the second is setting up a battle . Random chance? Or not?
Finally, I tested it on a fairly long LJ entry.
Female Score: 1266
Male Score: 1540
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: male!
Interesting. I would think that personal writing would be more likely to come out correct, not less.
The author of the site claims that the algorithm should have an 80% hit rate, but the results on the site are lot farther off, not quite 60%. Hm.
no subject
no subject
I think it's because we have these associations with "feminine" as being "weak". Which is stupid, but so culturally ingrained.
no subject
Yeah, unfortunately that's what I initially thought.