owlmoose: (tea - it's good for you)
Today was tea and snackies and the library with SE, then dinner with T, then the new series of Top Chef -- is it too soon to say that this cast looks promising? Then Nate Silver was on The Daily Show, and can I just say how much I love that one of the emerging narratives from this election cycle is pundits versus mathematics, and by just how much mathematics is winning?

Also, it looks like we will have 20 women Senators in the 113th Congress, and while some part of my brain is yelling at me ("20%? That's a freaking disgrace is what that is, why are you so happy?"), the rest of me is very, very happy.

I will likely have more to say about these things when I am not sneaking in my post for the day before I have to run off to bed. 'Night, all.
owlmoose: (Obamoose '08)
Not just because the president was re-elected, although this is, in my view, a very good thing. But so many other things have made me happy: the first out lesbian elected to the Senate, the first Asian-American woman in the Senate, a disabled female veteran going to the House of Representatives, New York state sending its first Asian woman to the house of representatives, two men who said idiotic things about rape losing their Senate races, two states legalizing pot, same sex marriage legalized in two states (Maine and Maryland) and probably also a third (Washington), and for the first time ever, it looks like voters will be rejecting an anti-marriage equality amendment to a state constitution, in Minnesota.

We are making history here, and making our voices heard. And it is awesome. If Proposition 30 passes (and at last count it was trending upward), my night will be complete. (Although I would have liked to see California ban the death penalty. But it's too popular here; it was never going to happen. I'll content myself with raising a bunch of money for education.)
owlmoose: (avengers - captain america)

I know I haven't posted much about the upcoming election here. Mostly because I haven't had much to say -- and what I thoughts I do have, I've gotten out of my system by reblogging stuff and sharing my thoughts on Tumblr -- and now I'm starting to hit a bit of overload. But one thing I won't let go, and that's voter fraud and voter suppression.Here are a few thoughts on what we, the electorate, can do to keep this election fair:


1. Vote! Vote, vote, vote, vote. The closer an election is, the easier it is for someone to steal it. The 2000 debacle in Florida was possible because the election was close enough to be within the margin of error. If a candidate gets an overwhelming victory, it's a lot harder to hide voter fraud within the margin of error.


2. Know your rights. Several recent voter ID laws have been thrown out by state courts (Texas and Pennsylvania for sure, and I believe there were others), but that information may not have trickled down to poll workers (or they may be willfully ignorant of it). This map shows which states require what kind of ID at the polls. If a poll worker insists otherwise, be calm but firm. Make sure that you cast at least a provisional ballot.


3. In general, don't leave without at least casting a provisional ballot. It's a federal law: if there's any question about whether you are legitimately registered, you have the right to cast a provisional ballot. This should be a last resort, because provisional ballots are often thrown out, but it's better than nothing.


4. If you don't trust the voting equipment, document your vote. If you have a cell phone camera, take a picture of your ballot. If you're on a voting machine that provides them, insist on a paper receipt. Clear up any irregularities before you leave your polling place -- even if your erroneous vote can't be changed, the poll workers and other voters are on notice that there is a problem.


5. If you're in line to vote before the polls close, you have the right to cast your ballot. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise!


6. If you have trouble, report it!  Do it right away. The US Department of Justice has a hotline and an email form for reporting voter intimidation and irregularities. You can also contact your state election board. There are also many news outlets and political organizations tracking reports of voter intimidation and irregularities. True the Vote is a non-partisan voter rights organization that's running a hotline: Except not, they are shills for the tea party. Stick with the DoJ.


7. Stand up for each other. If we support one another and our right to vote for our chosen candidate, it'll be a lot harder for poll workers to intimidate anyone.


8. Did I mention: vote? Please, please vote. Whomever you support. I've been hammering this hard for months now, I know, but only because it's so important. It's one of the most important things you can do as a citizen of the USA. So many of our elections are decided by such a small number of voters, and it's a shame. Get to the polls and make yourself heard, and don't let anyone steal your vote away.

owlmoose: (teamoose)
Wow, lots of new people from the friending meme! *waves to new people* Now I am going to scare you all away by writing about politics. ;)

So it's election time in California, and that means one thing: ballot initiatives. State, city, county, local. Since San Francisco is both a city and a county, at least I have one one layer of local ballot issues as opposed to many of my friends who have two, but still, it can get pretty out of control. The fact that I have "only" 18 to deal with this time around makes the ballot seem positively tiny. Still, it is a lot of things to read up on and figure out, and the fact that I'm sure the vast majority of my fellow Californians don't bother to do the same, but just vote based on TV ads and the titles of the propositions depresses me greatly. But I've ranted about the CA proposition system and how much I hate it before, so I'll spare you all that. This time. Fortunately, I had the chance to get together with friends today to talk through the ballot and share impressions and information, and I came away feeling pretty secure on how I'm going to vote on all the initiatives.

What I don't know is how to vote in local elections such as school board, and information and endorsements seem really hard to come by. And it's so important, because so much of politics is local. On a day-to-day basis, who sits on the school board probably has a much bigger impact on my life than who is president. And it can have larger ramifications, too: issues like teaching creationism in schools happens at a local level (not that I think we're in danger of a rash of creationists sneaking onto the school board in San Francisco), and many people start their political careers in positions like these. It's too bad that there isn't a better way to access the candidates' platforms, records, alliances, etc. Guess it's time to start digging.
owlmoose: photo of MLB shortstop Omar Vizquel (baseball - omar high-five)
Graphic displaying text 'I Voted!' in black on a white field. A red OTW logo replaces the letter O

As a long-time fan of the "I Voted" sticker (there are three on my computer monitor here, and at least one more on my desk at work), I thank whoever at the OTW thought of this, from the bottom of my heart. :)

Ugh

Nov. 9th, 2011 07:46 pm
owlmoose: (let go)
Looks like stupid Ed Lee won the stupid mayor's race. They're not officially calling it yet -- some absentee and provisional ballots left to count -- but he declared victory this afternoon. Dear San Francisco politicians: can we maybe get it together and run a smaller field next time? You do not all need to be mayor.

Work was stressful and annoying for reasons I'd rather not get into right now. Shoes keep dropping, but it never feels like the last one has fallen.

Mega Flare would be going well, but there's this one scene that I really hate, and I don't know how to fix it. I suppose I could cut it, but there's some important character interaction and canon crossing stuff. So I need to wrangle it into submission, somehow. I knew I should have put more effort into finding a beta.

Our water heater is leaking gas fumes, and last night I noticed that I was getting lightheaded when I sat at my desk for too long. T's upstairs trying to fix it right now, but he's not too hopeful.

At least there is new Top Chef tonight.

Progress

Nov. 8th, 2011 09:32 pm
owlmoose: (book - key)
It's probably cheating for so many of my posts this month to be about my Mega Flare progress, but it is the main focus of my time and attention right now, so maybe not? I can't decide.

Anyway. Got some good editing done yesterday and today, maybe halfway through this first editing run, and once this post is done, I'll dive back in. Current wordcount is 26,483; I haven't discovered any gaps yet, but I've flagged a few sections for possible rewrite. It would be in great shape if I had about a week longer, or at least if I weren't completely booked this weekend. As it is, well. We'll see.

In other news, bleah. If Ed Lee wins outright, I am going to be Very Irritated. Can San Francisco politics get nothing right?

All right, enough of that. Back to work. If you see me on Twitter or Tumblr, smack me on the hand, will you? Thanks.
owlmoose: (heroes - hiro dino)
Eleven candidates for mayor? Eleven? And I have to make a decision because the person I least want to see win is the incumbent?

At least in the old days I could have waited for the runoff, but no, SF had to adopt an instant runoff system (pick your top three candidates). So I get to pick now. Not to mention choosing among the three candidates for sheriff, and six for district attorney, and the half-dozen local propositions. Bleh.

Well, off to go read all my political spam. (Seriously, it's been ridiculous. I'm tempted to count up the number of mailers I've received over the last month and vote for the person who sent me the fewest. All those dead trees. Very sad.)
owlmoose: (art - gorey neville)
[personal profile] justira asked me to rant about share my opinions on California politics.

The first thing an outsider needs to know is that California is not a monolith. Like most states, we have an urban/rural divide, and it plays out pretty predictably: staunchly liberal urban areas (SF Bay Area, Los Angeles), a few conservative urban enclaves thanks to wealthy suburbanites (Orange County) and/or a strong military presence (San Diego), aging hippies and libertarians along the rural coast and in the mountains, and a solid Red State interior. So there is a sharp political divide in California, but the lines are not all drawn where you would expect them to be. There are cultural differences between Northern and Southern California, to be sure. But they don't really show up in our political discourse.

Okay, now that's out of the way, I'm going to focus on the real subject of this post: California's proposition system, and why I hate it with the fire of a thousand burning suns.

(Technically, there are three kinds of propositions: propositions, initiatives, and constitutional amendments. There are technical differences between them, but on the state ballot they are all referred to as "Proposition N" where N is the identifying number, so I will use "proposition" as a generic term throughout the post.)

Here's the deal. )

30 Days of... Project! Complete list of questions / Ask a question on LJ or on DW.
owlmoose: (ff12 - ashe)
[Sorry if you saw the earlier version of this I deleted; I was editing it so heavily that I decided I'd better just start over.]

I finished Rebecca Traister's Big Girls Don't Cry today, and although I enjoyed the heck out of it, I feel like I don't have much more to say about the events it covers that I didn't already say back when the 2008 election was happening. Although in way, having followed the story so closely at the time added to the pleasure of reading it, because I felt like I knew the players: the candidates, the feminist leaders, the bloggers, the talking heads. Another aspect familiar to me was Traister's own work; she drew heavily from the articles that she wrote about the elections, articles I remembered reading, and particularly one on being undecided between Clinton and Obama that influenced my own thinking on the issue. And although she and I came to different conclusions (she voted for Hillary, I voted for Barack), many of the emotions she described feeling about the election -- about Clinton's rise and fall, about the nomination of Sarah Palin, about the Democratic establishments failure to call out the sexism media until after the end of primary season -- resonated with me, both in my memory and now.

I did review it on GoodReads (and was the first person to do so -- it hasn't even received any other star ratings yet), and if the topic interests you even a little, I definitely recommend picking it up.
owlmoose: a picture of the Golden Gate Bridge, shrouded by fog (golden gate bridge)
Currently in the process of devouring Rebecca Traister's new book, Big Girls Don't Cry, a feminist take on the 2008 presidential election. Those of you who read my journal back in those days will know that this is an issue I felt rather strongly about, and Traister, a writer on politics and culture for Salon.com, was one of the bloggers whose writing about the campaign most resonated with me, so you can bet I snapped this book up when it came out today.

I hope I will come back with a more full report later, but so far the thing that's most struck me, reading this from the current perspective of a year and a half into a mostly-disappointing Obama administration, is the first chapter, which discusses why and how the feminist establishment fell out of love with Hillary Clinton. It's hard to remember now, but back in 2006 and 2007, many women who had loved Clinton as First Lady were not in love with her Senate record: shortly after being elected as Senator, she took a hard tack toward the center, working closely with the very Republicans and centrist Democrats who had tried to destroy her when she and Bill were in the White House; she had voted for the Iraq War and backed off her original positions on issues like abortion rights and healthcare, all in a bid to gain more influence in the Senate and, probably, setting herself up for her presidential run. Yet here we are, seeing the green grass on the other side where Clinton is serving as a most excellent Secretary of State and imagining how much better things would be, if only she were President. She wouldn't compromise; she wouldn't keep trying to meet these awful obstructionist Republicans halfway; she would have stuck to her plans! But would she have, really? It makes me wonder.

Anyway, so far, totally fascinating. I'll let you know what I think once I'm done.
owlmoose: (Default)
The outcome of the election in Maine is proof positive that we should not be making decisions regarding people's civil rights at the ballot box.

Take it away, Melissa McEwan:

Historically, we have depended on the courts to make decisions about the application of constitutional guarantees in spite of popular opinion, and they have repeatedly secured protections for marginalised groups decades before Congress and state legislatures, which more closely track public opinion, would have done. John Rogers once noted that "when the supreme court struck down the bans against interracial marriage in 1968 through Virginia v Loving, 72% of Americans were against interracial marriage. As a matter of fact, approval of interracial marriage in the US didn't cross the positive threshold until – sweet God – 1991".

That's exactly 30 years after our current president was born to an interracial couple.[1]

Waiting for the whole of society to be on board with granting equal rights to everyone is simply not in our collective best interest.


[1] And now, almost 20 years later, we have a justice of the peace who resigned rather than perform interracial marriages. Which just goes to show that prejudice against interracial couples is hardly dead. It isn't even hiding very well.

Attitudes do change. I have even seen them changing over my adulthood, to the point where a Washington state initiative legalizing strong civil unions is barely a blip on the national news radar. Remember when Vermont created civil unions and threw the entire nation into a tizzy? That was in 2000. Not even 10 years ago. So the tide will turn, eventually. We're seeing them in motion now. But (to switch metaphors) would the door even have started to open if judges -- first in Vermont, then in Massachusetts -- hadn't forced it a few cracks? Would Jim Crow laws ever have been defeated by popular vote? Guaranteeing our rights is what the court system is for. We should let it do its job.

Bad Citizen

Nov. 3rd, 2009 09:57 pm
owlmoose: (Default)
Stayed home sick from work today. Perhaps that's why I didn't remember until after noon that today was Election Day. I considered dragging myself off the couch and away from my Gilmore Girls DVDs to go vote on the half-dozen stupid local propositions on the ballot (nothing statewide for us this year, and all the city officials were running unopposed), but ultimately I decided against it, mostly because I hadn't prepared myself on the issues at all. I only knew what one of the propositions was even about, hardly an informed voter making thoughtful decisions about the future of my city. Not that I delude myself that most of my fellow citizens are. But I like to hold myself to a standard, at least.

It looks like they're all passing, and as far as I can tell, there's nothing egregiously stupid, so that's something.

Speaking of egregiously stupid... as of this writing, Question 1, the Maine initiative that would block the legalization of same-sex marriage, is too close to call. On the other hand, things are looking good in Washington, which may be poised to create domestic partnerships at the ballot box for the first time ever. I'm not ready to get excited yet, though; I'm afraid I got too badly burned last year. We'll wait, and we'll see.

(The song that was playing as I was writing the title down was "Hope Fails" from the Return of the King soundtrack; before I finished typing, the next song came on, and it was "Beautiful Day" by U2. Perhaps iTunes is trying to tell me something...)
owlmoose: (Default)
T and I were watching some of the videos generated by the latest Stephen Colbert remix challenge (now there is a man who knows how to harness the power of Web 2.0 to his advantage), and I mentioned that I think the ultimate speech-to-music remix is the Bill O'Reilly flip-out dance remix from a couple of years back. (Which, if you haven't seen it before, you really ought to do so, although it's helpful to watch the original Inside Edition outtake first.) This led him on a search for similar content, and thereby to the Political Remix Videos blog. The videos on there are of varying quality, but I found this mash-up of the three 2008 Obama/McCain debates to be particularly fascinating and well-done:



A few really telling moments in there, but my very favorite comes just at the end.
owlmoose: (Default)
First, the Pew Global Attitudes survey which finds, among other things, a correlation between religiousness and wealth on a national level. The chart is about halfway down the page. None of this is too surprising, really, but I found it interesting to see it laid out graphically. Most notable outlier? Surprise, surprise: it's the United States.

Commenters on Alas, a Blog (where I found the graph) raise the fair point that we can't tell from that chart how religiosity is measured.

Next, a piece at Shakesville on the potential resurrection of the woolly mammoth. What does that have to do with religion? That's what the Shaker would like to know:

It was a geniunely fascinating article. Until i got to end, where I read this bit:

"Catholic teaching opposes all human cloning, and all production of human beings in the laboratory, so I do not see how any of this could be ethically acceptable in humans," said Richard Doerflinger, an official with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.


What is that quote even doing in a science article? You never read a story about a church bake sale being interrupted with an interview from some Nietzschean saying "God is dead, cookies are pointless and futile."


It's as though the New York Times has a clause somewhere in all their science writers' contracts: no article about cloning without a quote from some religious official reminding us that human cloning is wrong.

Finally, on the lighter side, and also from Shakesville, here's a bit on write-in votes for Jesus, who came in fourth among in write-ins among Jacksonville, FL voters, tied with None of the Above. The write-in winner? Hillary Clinton. The whole post and as well as the comments are a highly amusing read; recommended.

Recount!

Nov. 20th, 2008 05:26 pm
owlmoose: (CJ)
Minnesota Public Radio gives us the opportunity to play ballot judge with actual ballots from the US Senate race.

It's neat to see all the different ways that ballots get spoiled and the reasons they get challenged. I voted with the majority almost every time. The only downside is that you don't get what decision the actual ballot judges made in the end.

It'll be interesting to see how this one comes out. At this point it sounds like it could really go either way.
owlmoose: (Default)
Check out this overlay of two maps: cotton-producing regions of the South circa 1860, and 2008 presidential election results by county.

The correlation is remarkably strong, and becomes even more apparent when you take a look at some of the maps here, particularly the map that shows the population density of African-Americans about halfway down the page. You can also see tinges of the same pattern on maps showing results by county for all the presidential elections going back to 1860 (!) -- the pattern doesn't hold that far back, of course, but you can see it to varying degrees in every election since 1968 (although Jimmy Carter's being from Georgia dulls the effect somewhat in 1976 and, to a lesser degree, in 1980.

If you want to take the effect back even further, here are maps showing how ancient geological forces laid rich soil in certain areas of the South, thereby creating prime cotton-growing areas and, eventually, counties that went heavily for Barack Obama in2008.

On a related note, here's a complete national map of the African-American population density, which I also found really striking. I hadn't realized just how much of the US black population was concentrated in the South. Look at the West, and how empty it looks, even in the more urban areas. There are maps for other ethnic groups, too. Now that would make for all kinds of interesting overlays.
owlmoose: (Default)
Really awesome write-ups and photos from all around the country:

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/11/15/6302
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=20EB36801D27B2D54BC3555301B53515?diaryId=8237

And now, for my contribution. First of all, today was gorgeous. Perfectly clear blue sky, temperatures easily in the 70s, a light breeze. Literally, I don't think we could have asked for better weather. So that was a plus, although the minus is that I didn't bring a hat. I did wear sunblock, at least.

A, who was in town for work this week, and SB came from from Sunnyvale to join us; we left the house around 10am and arrived a little before 10:30. R & S met us there, and we walked over to the Civic Center, where the protesters had gathered in front of City Hall. We hadn't gotten our act together to make signs, so we were mostly there to add our voices and our headcount. Speakers included current State Senator Carole Migden, her recently-elected replacement Mark Leno (who sponsored the two bills legalizing same-sex marriage that the CA Legislature passed but the Governator vetoed), the Rev. Amos Brown (who was easily the most inspiring and charismatic of the lot -- no surprise, since he was taught by Dr. King himself), and many local community members and organizers. Unfortunately, it was hard to hear much and impossible to see at all, because they spoke on the steps of City Hall, not a raised platform, and the sound system was really inadequate. The chant we heard most frequently wasn't any particular call for equal rights, but rather the word "Louder!" But what I could hear was mostly energizing and hopeful, and it was nice to be part of a crowd. As we were walking from the subway to the plaza, we were all trying to remember the last time we had been part of a group action like this, and I decided it was probably my freshman year of college, when A and I went down to Washington DC with a bunch of other BMC folks for the March for Women's Lives. There's something exhilarating about being surrounded by people who feel strongly enough to get up early on a Saturday to lend their voices to a cause.

So the rally held in place for about an hour and a half, and then a group of folks broke off into a march. After about half the crowd had left, a speaker told us that the march was unofficial, but anyone was welcome to join. So we consulted, and then decided to follow. We marched down Polk Street to Market, then turned right to head for Castro. Clearly this march had not been planned, because except for Polk, none of the streets were officially closed, although there were cops around and they did direct traffic for us. Anyway, our turn toward the Castro led to some debate as to whether that neighborhood was really the best place to demonstrate in favor of gay marriage -- I think I said something about coals to Newcastle -- but then we reached Van Ness, and a large group had switched directions, shouting "Turn around, go downtown!" And we saw the effectiveness of chants and mob rule as the majority of walkers did indeed follow. We discussed our options; hunger beat out curiosity, and so we headed to Hayes Valley for lunch.

So it wasn't the best organized event ever. But it was satisfying, and I continue to be energized enough to stay involved. I don't know that there's much to do while the various cases wind their way through court, but I will keep my ears open for opportunities to lend my voice and my time.

Some more of T's photos here.
owlmoose: (Default)
I really wanted to include this graphic in yesterday's post re. the Prop 8 protests tomorrow, but I couldn't find it online until now. I saw it as a poster in the Muni station on my way home last night, and I just loved the evocation of so many Americans standing together as one.

(The list of cities on this map isn't anywhere near exhaustive, btw; complete list here if you're looking to join in.)
owlmoose: (Default)
Many of you have probably already heard about the nationwide protests against the passage of Proposition 8 on Saturday. At least one protest somewhere every state at 2:30 Eastern Time, Saturday, November 15th. The San Francisco event is at City Hall (of course), and I'm thinking really seriously about going. (Any locals interested in joining: ping me ASAP!)

I do wonder, though, about why now. Where was this outpouring of emotion and support two weeks ago, when it could have made a much more immediate difference? Dan Savage has a good take on why the reaction was delayed, but I still wonder. Of course, that raises the question of whether it would have made a difference. I think it would have, but who can say, really?

And I have to admit, late as it may be, it does me good to see how many other people are outraged by what happened to gay rights on November 4th. Momentum is shifting, and visibility can only help with that. Which is the main reason I am moved to join in on Saturday.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
2021222324 2526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2025 06:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios